The biggest story of the week so far in Monte Carlo was Djokovic losing in his opening round to Davidovich Fokina. Fokina has now made the quarterfinals, after beating David Goffin in straight sets today, and is playing excellently.

Djokovic was reportedly ill and physically ‘ran out of gas’ in the third set. He was also broken 9 times overall, which is the most of any best of three sets match in his career. But Davidovich Fokina was the better player throughout the entire match with the exception of the end of the 2nd set tiebreaker.

It’s much too early to read that deeply into Djokovic’s loss. Not only does he have a poor recent record in Monte Carlo, but it’s also just his 4th match of the year, in mid April. Djokovic also lost early to Dan Evans last year in Monte Carlo before making the final of Rome and winning Roland Garros a month or so later. It’s definitely premature to declare his demise. But there were a bunch of telltale signs of what Djokovic is going to need to do to right his ship in the months to come, and of what Davidovich Fokina did so well to compound Djokovic’s issues.

Fokina exploits Djokovic’s early clay season weaknesses

Novak at his best on this surface is both a rally beast and an early point aggression beast. But against Davidovich Fokina, the world No.1 really had no reliable ways to win points, whether they be short or long. In the sets he lost (sets 1 & 3), Djokovic won just half of his 1st serve points (or 24/48 points or 50%), which is in the top 10 worst serving performances of his clay career. His career avg on 1st serve points won on clay is 71%. Novak was serving a little bit slower than some of his clay court season last year but it was really Djokovic’s inability to do damage on his 1st and 2nd shots, after the serve, that hurt him most.

When Djokovic was serving in set one, he was winning the shorter points but the majority of points played on his serve were over 5 shots rather than under (20 to 17), i.e Fokina was able to return the Djokovic serve and set up a relatively neutral baseline rallies. Not only that but Fokina was also enjoying more serve dominance of his own, playing and winning most of his service points in the 0-4 shot range. This was a double whammy of bad news for Djokovic, unable to win too many free or easy points on his serve, and unable to return the favour and make Fokina’s serving life difficult with his return.

And things only got worse for Djokovic in set 3:

In set 3 not only was Fokina still winning most of his service points pretty comfortably in the 0-4 shot range, but Djokovic was spending even more of his own service points playing longer rallies (a whopping 25 points played over 5 shots). Novak was also losing even the short points on his serve (7 points to 8).

Simply, Djokovic had little to no serving advantage (while Fokina did), and got outplayed by Fokina in the longer baseline exchanges.

No wonder Djokovic was flagging by set 3, ill or not. He was having to contest most of his service games in tough baseline rallies and had to play far more of them overall (126 Djokovic service points played to Fokina’s 93!).

This is part of what has made Djokovic so difficult to beat in his 30’s more generally. An improved serve that means he often gets to breeze through his own service games and then make a nuisance of himself on return of serve. But if opponents can make Djokovic’s serving life less routine, as Fokina did this week, there are late-career cracks that can appear, especially on the back of time away from competition.

This has been a theme for Djokovic in early parts of his clay seasons for some time now post-prime. He initially struggles to find the kind of power he needs, especially off his forehand wing, and ends up playing gruelling exchanges which compound physically. Davidovich Fokina seemed to recognise this very early on, and partially because of the wind, but also because the Spaniard knew that Djokovic wasn’t going to blast him off the court with winners early in the point, he employed an intelligent return strategy by making lots of returns down the middle:

This meant that Davidovich Fokina, who is not known for having a particularly big or effective serve, actually hit a higher % of unreturned 1st serves than Djokovic (15% to Djokovic’s 14%), forcing Djokovic into plenty of neutral baseline rallies (where Novak was an underdog on this particular day).

In those rallies over 5 shots, Davidovich Fokina hit 24 winners and got 28 unforced errors from Djokovic. Djokovic hit 15 winners and got 18 unforced errors from Davidovich Fokina. Fokina had better offence and made fewer mistakes in neutral baseline rallies.

This point is a nice microcosm for much of Djokovic’s (far end in orange) service struggles in this match. Fokina plays a nice, central return to initiate a rally, Djokovic plays some non-forcing, safe forehands and Fokina takes advantage by being aggressive.
Similar again. A good central Fokina return of serve, Djokovic then does better with his serve+1 forehand but ends up missing the next one when trying to be aggressive. These are the kinds of forehands Novak won’t usually miss at the tail end of the clay season. But they’re not uncommon at the beginning.

Djokovic tried occasional drop shots to shorten points and avoid longer rallies, as he so often has in the last few clay seasons, but Fokina’s excellent foot speed scuppered most of them. He tried to be more aggressive with his forehands but either missed (as above) or didn’t find the depth. And Novak did actually manage to win the most important long point of the 2nd set (the very entertaining set point). But over the course of the three set match, Fokina simply looked more comfortable in multiple different ways to win points. Either Djokovic will need a clay season full of even better than usual drop shots and net play, or his shot tolerance and forehand offence will need a significant bump in performance (or preferably for him, both).

As great as Djokovic’s backhand is, it’s still (like 99% of players on the tour) his forehand that does most of the offensive damage and sets up a lot of his opportunities to be offensive with his backhand, especially on a surface like clay. That shot, along with his 1st serve, haven’t clicked for him yet. We’ll see if he can start to remedy that in his home tournament of Belgrade next week. Look for serve+1 potency and especially his ability to create space to hit into with early point forehands.


Simultaneously a great result and performance from Davidovich Fokina, who gets a win over his idol, and not-the-worst-loss-in-the-world for an undercooked Djokovic.

Davidovich Fokina post match: “When he (Novak) won the second set it was tough mentally, but I am working so hard to be more focussed. It doesn't matter if I lost the second set or I lost the first set. I have to be prepared for the war.”

Davidovich Fokina, caked in clay and bleeding from multiple dives and falls, was very obviously prepared for war. Djokovic, after his bizarre start to the season, isn’t battle hardened yet.

- MW

Twitter: @mattracquet

I’ll see paid subscribers on Sunday for Monte Carlo final analysis.

The Racquet goes out twice a week, a (free) piece every Thursday/Friday and a (paid) analysis piece every Sunday. You can subscribe here (first week free):

Give a gift subscription

Read The Racquet in the Substack app
Available for iOS and Android

Top and Bottom: Manuel Queimadelos/Quality Sport Images/Getty

Most recent:

The Racquet
Equal pay equal play?
L…
Read more
The Racquet
Iga x2
Świątek d Osaka: 6-4, 6-0 A complete rout. Świątek confirmed her position as the best player in the world and demonstrated the significant hard court improvements she’s made since these two players last met in 2019 (Osaka won that last and only meeting in straight sets…
Read more
The Racquet
Backhand Balance
Alcaraz d Tsitsipas: 7-5, 6-3 At the end of the first set, of what was a very high level Alcaraz vs Tsitsipas match last night, I tweeted this (don’t worry about the graphics, I’ll post better versions of them below…
Read more
The Racquet
Barty came, beat the game, and left
Ashleigh Barty, the world No.1, has retired from tennis. She is 25 years old and the holder of two out of the last three Slams, the 2022 Australian Open and 2021 Wimbledon (also winning Roland Garros in 2019). I’m so happy, I’m so ready, and I know at the moment, in my heart for me as a person, this is right…
Read more
The Racquet
Airbending In The Desert
As I write this Nadal is currently losing to Taylor Fritz in the Indian Wells final, although physical issues, Fritz (left ankle) and Nadal (left pec), are making that a pretty questionable match quality and strategy wise. So I thought I’d focus on the marquee match yesterday…
Read more
The Racquet
The 10% Chance
Yesterday Nadal came back from a double break deficit in the 3rd set against Sebastian Korda in Indian Wells. Korda served for the match twice and was broken twice by Nadal (who happens to be his idol), before Rafa won the deciding tiebreak. Nadal offered up some interesting insights in his post match presser…
Read more
The Racquet
The Big 3 Moat
I usually don’t write about the ‘Big 3’ of Federer, Nadal and Djokovic in any general sense with one recent exception. For the most part, The Racquet is about topical things happening in tennis like matchplay & play-style analysis, or bigger picture developments in the sport. At this point enough attention is already paid to those three players, often a…
Read more
The Racquet
Tennis and the veneer of etiquette
Tennis didn’t properly discipline Karolína Plíšková when she hit and broke an umpire’s chair with her racquet. Tennis didn’t properly discipline Kyrgios when he spat at an umpire and verbally abused him. Tennis didn’t properly discipline Daniil Medvedev when he…
Read more
The Racquet
Too Damn Good
Auger-Aliassime d Tsitsipas: 6-4, 6-2 An extremely easy bit of analysis. Auger-Aliassime (FAA) played flawless tennis and enjoyed a significant serve-return edge against Tsitsipas all match long. The Canadian didn’t dip once. A stunning performance worthy of his first ATP Tour title…
Read more
The Racquet
Defusing the Big Serving Counterpuncher Bomb
I’ve written a lot (probably too much) about the ‘Big Serving Counterpuncher’ playstyle that has emerged at the top of men’s tennis. Medvedev and Zverev, via huge serves and unusually good return and movement performances for their height, can both embody it, and have terrorised plenty of opponents over the last few years with it. But something interest…
Read more
The Racquet
Towering Peaks
It looks like Juan Martín del Potro will soon be leaving the sport. Outside of some Hail Mary medical interventions, Delpo says he’ll likely be bidding farewell to tennis after his matches on clay in Buenos Aires and Rio over the next two weeks. Both events will hopefully offer raucous receptions on the surface he grew up on. I hope he’s wrong about his…
Read more
The Racquet
Tennis AI
I’m going to break one of my own rules today. I’m going to write about Federer, Nadal and Djokovic in a way that makes sweeping generalisations about their playstyles. This is often my pet peeve in tennis coverage: commentators or pundits falling back on the outdated, decade-old stereotypes of Federer as effortlessly balletic, Nadal as the indomitable g…
Read more
The Racquet
The Future Of Tennis - Part 2
NB: This essay focuses on the digital and technological future of tennis more so than things like in-person tournament growth, format changes and participation. More on those soon. Part one is here, it helps but you don’t need to have read it for part two to make sense…
Read more